Wind Power Growth in Oaxaca and Eólica del Sur
Renewable vitality is important for reaching local weather change mitigation targets and sustainable improvement (Allen, Metternicht & Wiedmann, 2019). For Mexico, wind vitality serves because the nation’s most important device for reaching its Nationally Decided Contributions (NDCs) below the Paris Settlement (Elzen et al., 2019). In Mexico, the state Oaxaca has a number of the world’s greatest wind vitality circumstances and has thus skilled large-scale wind vitality improvement (Mejía-Montero, Alonso-Serna, Altamirano-Allende, 2020). Nonetheless, an built-in strategy that acknowledges local-specific contexts is missing (Guimarães, 2020). This paper will analyze the biggest wind farm mission in Oaxaca, Eólica del Sur, and with the assistance of the core rules of environmental justice and political ecology, establish and focus on the outcomes, challenges, and potential enhancements of Eólica del Sur.
Eólica del Sur is the biggest wind farm in Latin America, consisting of 132 wind generators with the capability to generate 396 megawatts of renewable vitality (Zárate-Toledoa, Patiño & Fragaa, 2019). The Mexican Authorities, Oaxaca’s Governor, and the mission planners of Eólica del Sur (2014) describe the wind farm as a local weather change mitigation initiative that concurrently helps scale back poverty in Oaxaca by investments and job creation (Gobierno de Oaxaca, 2019; SEGOB, 2015). The mission has, nonetheless, been extremely controversial.
The preliminary section of Eólica del Sur occurred in 2004, planning to assemble 132 wind generators crossing two municipalities in Oaxaca. Nonetheless, uncertainty over landownership claims and land leasing agreements for the wind farm led the 2 municipalities into battle with one another, the Oaxacan Authorities, and the corporate in command of Eólica del Sur (Rueda, 2011). After years of battle, Eólica del Sur was moved to a different municipality in Oaxaca, the place the corporate in command of Eólica del Sur paid excessive sums of cash to sure neighborhood leaders whereas not informing massive components of the native inhabitants concerning the mission (Dunlap, 2018). Area people members within the new location confronted the corporate and the mayor in command of the mission (Mejía, 2017). The opposition to the wind farm succeeded in stopping the mission, and in 2013 the wind farm was suspended by authorized motion (Dunlap, 2018; OHCHR, 2013).
The development of Eólica del Sur was relocated to 2 different municipalities in Oaxaca, Juchitán and El Espinal (Adams, 2014). A brand new vitality reform was handed in Mexico throughout relocation, demanding that vitality sector tasks conduct a free, prior, and knowledgeable consent (FPIC) process inside all indigenous areas (Huesca-Pérez, Sheinbaum-Pardo & Köppel, 2016). As a result of massive indigenous populations in Juchitán and El Espinal, an FPIC process occurred between 2014 and 2015. In 2015 the mission was lastly accepted and development started in 2017 (Zárate-Toledoa, Patiño & Fragaa, 2019). Nonetheless, indigenous communities in Juchitán and El Espinal filed a lawsuit in opposition to Eólica del Sur on claims of an insufficient FPIC process (Chaca, 2019). The court docket in Oaxaca, and later the Supreme Courtroom in Mexico, dominated that the FPIC had been completed accurately and that Eólica del Sur ought to proceed (Espino, 2018). In 2019, the Eólica del Sur wind farm was inaugurated, portrayed as a local weather change mitigation initiative that reduces poverty in Oaxaca (Gobierno de Oaxaca, 2019). Nonetheless, protests and disapproval of the mission from indigenous neighborhood members proceed (Matías 2019).
Outcomes of Eólica del Sur
In response to two of Mexico’s largest newspapers and the Governor of Oaxaca, the mission’s final result has been profitable. All three sources declare that Eólica del Sur will assist Mexico attain their NDCs by avoiding 567,000 tons of CO2 emissions per yr. Concurrently, Eólica del Sur will scale back poverty by creating 2,500 jobs whereas encouraging extra regional investments. Oaxaca’s Governor emphasizes that Eólica del Sur is the primary vitality mission within the area that has gone by a profitable FPIC process (Zavala, 2020; El Economist, 2019; Gobierno de Oaxaca, 2019). Nonetheless, previous wind vitality tasks in Oaxaca have primarily benefitted the Authorities and personal corporations at indigenous communities’ expense (Howe & Boyer, 2015; Dunlap, 2017; Sellwood & Valdiva, 2018). Opposition in opposition to Eólica del Sur from indigenous communities in Juchitán and El Espinal thus point out that the mission follows previous wind farm trajectories within the area by creating native struggles resulting in opposition (Matías, 2019). As a result of opposition in opposition to Eólica del Sur, the rest of this part will analyze the tasks final result critically, with a give attention to the native contexts in Juchitán and El Espinal, with assist of the three pillars of environmental justice (Walker, 2009; Setyowati, 2021).
The primary pillar, distributive justice, entails equally distributed burdens and advantages regarding vitality manufacturing and consumption (Setyowati, 2021). Oaxaca is without doubt one of the most biodiverse areas on this planet, and though wind vitality is a device for local weather change mitigation, wind farms can adversely influence native biodiversity (Feria, 2018; UN, 2012; Kati et al., 2021). Eólica del Sur (2014) performed an environmental influence evaluation (EIA) to mitigate any hostile environmental influence of Eólica del Sur. Nonetheless, the EIA did not account for a number of local-specific components, resulting in deforestation, land degradation, noise air pollution, and biodiversity loss (Tapia et al., 2015; Nardi & Ramirez, 2017). The indigenous inhabitants’s livelihoods in Juchitán and El Espinal rely upon the native setting and biodiversity to maintain their livelihoods by fishing, forestry, and agriculture. Via noise air pollution that scares away fish, deforestation that reduces forestry jobs, and fewer land for agriculture Eólica del Sur has, subsequently, adversely impacted native indigenous communities’ livelihoods within the two municipalities (Nardi & Ramirez, 2017).
Furthermore, since 2019, as soon as the farm had been inaugurated, many residents haven’t skilled any employment alternatives from Eólica del Sur whereas experiencing revenue losses as a result of much less forests, fishing, and agriculture alternatives (Ramirez, 2019). As an alternative, Eólica del Sur has created advantages for particular person landowners, who lease their lands in trade for financial funds (Contreras, 2020). The Authorities advantages from much less emissions as a result of cleaner vitality whereas creating additional investments within the area (Gobierno de Oaxaca, 2019). Moreover, the multinational corporations in command of the mission will reap a excessive charge of return on their investments (Ramirez, 2019). Therefore, the outcomes of Eólica del Sur have led to unequally distributed burdens because the indigenous communities’ livelihoods are severely undermined in Juchitán and El Espinal whereas stakeholders on a neighborhood, nationwide, and worldwide stage have benefitted from the mission.
To seize the total nature of the outcomes of Eólica del Sur, recognition and procedural justice, that are intertwined with distributional justice, should be thought of (Walker, 2009). Procedural justice considerations that every one stakeholders take part equally and meaningfully in all vitality choices, whereas recognition justice give attention to how vitality choices influence individuals’s histories and distinct identities (Setyowati, 2021). The landownership in Juchitán and El Espinal is complicated. Typically, people have their very own land plots for agriculture, whereas an indigenous meeting should approve choices regarding broader land-use adjustments locally (Huesca-Pérez et al., 2016). In response to Eólica del Sur (2014) and the Mexican Authorities (2015), the FPIC process accounted for the native indigenous individuals’s views when planning the mission. Nonetheless, a doc with 1167 signatures from Indigenous individuals’s in Juchitán claims that the FPIC process occurred after the land for the wind vitality mission had already been secured (CER, 2017). Eólica del Sur circumvented the indigenous landownership governance constructions by establishing leasing agreements with particular person landowners immediately and by having insufficient FPIC procedures that didn’t permit lively participation of all indigenous peoples (Contreras, 2020; CER, 2017). By not recognizing the indigenous collective governance constructions in Juchitán and El Espinal whereas not permitting full participation of indigenous communities, Eólica del Sur has violated the correct of recognition and procedural justice.
Mexico’s ambition to achieve their NDCs by avoiding 567,000 tons of CO2 emissions per yr whereas lowering poverty in Oaxaca by the Eólica del Sur mission has led to unintended outcomes. By not adhering to the three pillars of environmental justice, the outcomes of Eólica del Sur have therefore led to social battle and opposition in opposition to the mission amongst the indigenous neighborhood members (Huesca-Pérez et al., 2016; Matías 2019).
Dialogue: Analyzing the Outcomes
So far, this paper has defined how the end result of Eólica del Sur has adversely impacted the native indigenous communities in Juchitán and El Espinal whereas benefitting native landowners, the Authorities, and the multinational corporations (MNCs) in command of Eólica del Sur with the assistance of the three pillars of environmental justice. This part will draw on political ecology and clarify why these outcomes occurred for a mission intending to realize environmental and social sustainability.
Robbins (2011: 202) claims that “improvement and environmental administration initiatives, irrespective of how properly meant, are typically primarily based on assumptions” on what the individuals topic to the initiative wants. Sixty-seven % of Oaxaca’s inhabitants lives in poverty, whereas half of the inhabitants lives in remoted rural areas (Huesca-Pérez et al., 2016). In response to Eólica del Sur (2014) and the Mexican Authorities (2015), the wind farm would assist Oaxaca’s poverty points by creating extra jobs, particularly for individuals in rural areas distant from different job alternatives. Nonetheless, sixteen % of the indigenous inhabitants in Juchitán and El Espinal doesn’t communicate Spanish, and twenty-five % are illiterate (Huesca-Pérez et al., 2016). Though Eólica del Sur created 2,500 jobs, most jobs require expert labour (El Economist, 2019; Friede, 2016). Eólica del Sur and Authorities officers therefore assumed that the mission would profit the poorest inhabitants by creating jobs with out accounting for the widespread lack of Spanish and illiteracy in Juchitán and El Espinal (Friede, 2016).
Furthermore, together with native environmental and socio-economic information is essential for creating environmentally and socially sustainable outcomes in environmental tasks (Robbins, 2011). The indigenous peoples in Juchitán and El Espinal expressed that Eólica del Sur would create environmental issues from the start of the mission and never create any socio-economic advantages for a lot of the inhabitants (Jung, 2017; Burnett, 2016). Despite the fact that native indigenous information is acknowledged as necessary in environmental tasks, the information is difficult to account for because of the scales and disturbances fashionable tasks exerts on nature (Tsosie, 2019; Wohling, 2009). In response to Robbins (2011: 134), “whereas native information is more and more on the agenda, the distinction between formal and casual information programs stays a supply of battle.” As an alternative, scientists and ‘consultants’ typically acquire the dominant affect throughout decision-making processes. The “separation from native information and follow” undermines each fairness and ecological sustainability (Robbins, 2011: 192). Lack of accounting for native environmental and socio-economic information in Juchitán and El Espinal therefore led to environmental degradation, undermining indigenous peoples livelihoods, as a result of favouring scientists’ recommendation that performed the EIA (Tapia et al., 2015). The dearth of employment for a lot of locals might be defined by a lack of information concerning the local-specific context and assumptions from ‘consultants’ concerning the native inhabitants in Juchitán and El Espinal’s wants (Friede, 2016).
An additional issue that led to the indigenous communities’ hostile outcomes in Juchitán and El Espinal was the approval of particular person land leasing agreements of collectively owned lands (Contreras, 2020; CER, 2017). The influence of this led to the privatization of collectively- owned land, disregarding the indigenous governance constructions (Huesca-Pérez et al., 2016). The privatization and appropriation of collectively-owned land have been justified by a story of local weather change mitigation and poverty discount, which was the promised final result of Eólica del Sur, often known as ‘inexperienced grabbing’ (SEGOB, 2015). Inexperienced grabbing “[involves] the restructuring of guidelines and authority within the entry, use and administration” of land and assets within the title of an environmental good (Fairhead, Leach & Scoones, 2012: 239). The narrative of local weather change mitigation by wind farm deployment on a global and nationwide stage can clarify the method of inexperienced grabbing and therefore the shortage of procedural and recognition justice in Juchitán and El Espinal.
Inexperienced grabbing by privatization is usually justified by legislations (Fairhead, Leach & Scoones, 2012), whereas understanding ‘the complexity of property rights over pure items and programs, particularly in conventional societies’ is important to grasp socioeconomic and environmental adjustments (Robbins, 2011: 202). Oaxaca has an indigenous inhabitants of sixty % with complicated landownership rights (Mejía-Montero et al., 2020). A decree in 1964 acknowledges the communal pre-colonial indigenous governance construction of the land, acknowledged by the Mexican structure (Magaloni et al., 2019). Nonetheless, in line with a decree in 1966, particular person landowners can have interaction in land transactions, whereas a revision of the Mexican structure in 1992 permits the privatization of communal property (Contreras, 2020; Dunlap, 2017). In response to Villagómez, Gómez, and Zafra (1998: 103), the conflicting landownership claims stay uncertain, and “even authorities companies report conflicting knowledge on landholding patterns” in Oaxaca. On account of political marginality, many important people and teams are sometimes ignored by decision-makers and planners in improvement and environmental initiatives, which is very prevalent for indigenous individuals concerning environmental administration choices (Robbins, 2011; Benedict, Amy & Bethany, 2019). The political marginalization of indigenous peoples in Juchitán and El Espinal therefore led them to be ignored by decision-makers and planners of Eólica del Sur (CER, 2017). This allowed the person landowners’ leasing agreements to be favoured over the collective indigenous governance system.
Moreover, inexperienced grabbing typically entails worldwide, nationwide, and native stage collaboration (Dunlap, 2017). Internationally, the narrative of Eólica del Sur as a local weather change mitigation initiative and the decision from the United Nations (2012) to create insurance policies and enterprise fashions that take away any boundaries to large-scale renewable vitality deployment encourage favouring the person land possession claims over the collective indigenous governance system in Oaxaca. Moreover, nationally, the Mexican Structure’s change in 1992 made it potential to denationalise indigenous communal lands, a standard technique to justify inexperienced grabbing (Dunlap, 2017; Fairhead, Leach & Scoones, 2012). The complexity over landownership claims in Oaxaca led Eólica del Sur to bypass the indigenous land governance constructions and negotiate leasing agreements with particular person landowners, and undermine the FPIC process (Huesca-Pérez et al., 2016; CER, 2017). The flexibility to denationalise indigenous lands allowed Mexican courts to favour particular person landownership rights, whereas the worldwide calls to take away any boundaries to renewable vitality internationally additional justified the choice (Dunlap, 2017; UN, 2012). The flexibility to signal leasing agreements of land in Juchitán and El Espinal with particular person landowners and circumvent the collective governance system has therefore been made potential because of the privatization of communal land and the narrative of doing no matter it takes to deploy renewable vitality, following the standard narrative of inexperienced grabbing (Fairhead, Leach & Scoones, 2012). The narrative of local weather change mitigation and poverty discount thus created poor recognition and procedural justice for the indigenous communities in Juchitán and El Espinal by justifying the privatization and appropriation of indigenous communal land by Eólica del Sur.
Conclusion: Potential Enhancements
The primary points with Eólica del Sur might be recognized as an absence of accounting for native indigenous information, lack of livelihoods, privatization and appropriation of communal land, and lack of clear session of the indigenous peoples in Juchitán and El Espinal. These 4 points should be addressed to enhance the mission.
As proven on this paper, together with native indigenous information is essential for environmentally and socially sustainable outcomes of the wind farm mission, additional supported by the literature (Robbins, 2011; Tsosie, 2019; Wohling, 2009). Native indigenous information concerning the setting and socio-economic circumstances ought to thus be included in Eólica del Sur. A technique of together with indigenous information in renewable vitality tasks is the Bolivian strategy ‘dialogue between knowledges’. The strategy goals to embrace fashionable expertise and mix it with native indigenous information to create a “non-invasive method to obtain new options,” (Panosera, 2012: 6702). The influence of this could permit for native indigenous environmental information to be integrated within the decision-making course of and restrict the lack of livelihoods for individuals within the area by higher environmental outcomes (Pansera, 2012; Tsosie, 2019).
Since Eólica del Sur has not created any advantages for the native indigenous communities, the mission ought to take into account taking a extra communal strategy to wind vitality deployment (Ramirez, 2019). Juchitán and El Espinal acknowledge each communal and particular person land legally (Villagómez, Gómez & Zafra, 1998). Eólica del Sur ought to honour such landownership complexity and search to implement extra communitarian wind farms. Such wind farm tasks may foster collective capabilities, embrace native indigenous information extra simply, and permit the indigenous neighborhood members to participate within the earnings (Contreras, 2020). Such measures have considerably benefitted indigenous communities in different components of the world by honouring indigenous governance constructions and livelihood help (Krupa, 2012).
Since 1,167 indigenous peoples in Juchitán declare that the FPIC process was insufficient, they need to obtain actual session and lively participation, and be acknowledged as actual stakeholders. Attaining this could require the inclusion of social dimensions of transitioning to renewable vitality, equivalent to local people members’ wants and pursuits, full participation, and permitting the indigenous peoples to develop into actual companions within the mission (Villavicencio & Mauger, 2017; Baxter, 2017). Moreover, this could permit the native indigenous information to be carried out additional within the mission and therefore create higher outcomes for Eólica del Sur (Coates, 2016).
Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Weidmann, T. (2019). Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages, Sustainability Science, 14, 421–438
Anaya, J. (2015). Observaciones del profesor S. James Anaya sobre la consulta en el contexto del proyecto Energía Eólica del Sur en Juchitán de Zaragoza. February 23. Consulta Indígena en Juchitán. Obtainable at: https://consultaindigenajuchitan.wordpress.com/documentos2/documentos/
Baxter, J. (2017). Power justice: Participation promotes acceptance. Nat Power, 2, 17128
Benedict, C., Amy, M., & Bethany, B. (2019). Margins and Sidelines: The Marginalisation of Indigenous Views in Worldwide Local weather Governance, Newcastle Regulation Overview, 14, 30-50
Burnett, V. (2016). Los parques eólicos generan prosperidad en Oaxaca, pero no para todos. New York Instances, 1 August.
(CER) Heart for Environmental Rights (Centro de Derechos Ambientales). (2017). Más de Mil Zapotecos Piden a La SCJN Atraer Caso Contra Eólica Del Sur En Juchitán’. Centro de Derechos Ambientales.
Chaca, R. (2019). Un proyecto envuelto en conflictos y pugna indígena. El Common. 29 Might.
Coates, Okay. (2016). First Nations engagement within the vitality sector in Western Canada. Indian Useful resource Council. Alberta Canada.
Contreras, G. A. T. (2020). The politics of wind vitality within the Isthmus of Tehuantepec : wind, land and social distinction. Thesis (Ph.D.). College of Sussex: Sussex.
Dunlap, A. (2017a). Wind Power: Towards a “Sustainable Violence” in Oaxaca. NACLA report on the Americas, 49(4), 483-488.
Dunlap, A. (2017b). ‘The City is Surrounded:’ From Local weather Issues to Life Underneath Wind Generators in La Ventosa, Mexico, Human Geography, 10(2), 16-36.
Dunlap, A. (2018). Revolt for Land, Sea and Dignity: Resistance and Autonomy in opposition to Wind Power in Álvaro Obregón, Mexico. Journal of Political Ecology, 25(1).
El Economista. (2019). Oaxaca detona generación de energía eólica, El Economista, 28 Might.
Elzen, M., Kuramochi, T., Hohne, N., Cantzler, J., Esmeijer, Okay., Fekete, H., Fransen, T., Kermidas, Okay., Roelfsema, M., Sha, F., van Soest, H., Vandryck, T. (2019). Are the G20 economies making sufficient progress to fulfill their NDC targets?, Power Coverage, 126, 238-250.
Eólica del Sur. (2014). Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Regional. Energía Eólica del Sur, S.A.P.I de C.V.
Espino, M. (2018). SCJN niega amparo a pueblo indígena contra parque eólico en Oaxaca. El Common. 14 November.
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012) Inexperienced Grabbing: a brand new appropriation of nature?, Journal of Peasant Research, 39(2), 237-261.
Feria, Y. G. (2018). Wind Energy and Environmental Justice: The Case of Istmo de Tehuantepec. Inexperienced Crime in Mexico. In Arroyo-Quiroz, I., & Wyatt, T. (Eds.) Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 87-102.
Friede, S. (2016). Enticed by the wind. A Case Examine within the Social and Historic Context of Wind Power Growth in Southern Mexico. Wilson Heart.
Gobierno de Mexico (Mexican Authorities). (2015). Power Transition Regulation. Cámara de Diputados. Retrieved from: http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LTE.pdf
Gobierno de Oaxaca (Authorities of Oaxaca). (2019). Oaxaca, líder indiscutible en generación de energía eólica y seguro para inversionistas: Alejandro Murat, Govierno de Oaxaca, Obtainable at https://www.oaxaca.gob.mx/comunicacion/oaxaca-lider-indiscutible-en-generacion-de-energia-eolica-y-seguro-para-inversionistas-alejandro-murat/
Guimarães, L. N. (2020). Is there a Latin American electrical energy transition? A snapshot of intraregional variations. In Guimarães, L. N. (Ed.) The Regulation and Coverage of Latin American Power Transitions. Sao Paulo, Brazil: ScienceDirect eBooks, pp. 3-20.
Howe, C. & Dominic, B. (2015). Aeolian Politics. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Principle, 16(1): 31–48.
Huesca-Pérez, M. E., Sheinbaum-Pardo, C., & Köppel, J. (2016). Social implications of siting wind vitality in a deprived area – The case of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico. Renewable and Sustainable Power Evaluations, 58, 952-965
Jung, C. (2017). The politics of horizontal inequality. Indigenous opposition to wind farm improvement in Mexico. Wider Working Paper 2017/146. UNU-Wider
Kati, V., Kassara, C., Vrontisi, Z., & Moustakas, A. (2021). The biodiversity-wind energy-land use nexus in a worldwide biodiversity hotspot, Science of The Complete Atmosphere, 768(144471).
Krupa, J. (2012). Figuring out boundaries to Aboriginal renewable vitality deployment in Canada. Power Coverage, 42, 710-714.
Magaloni, B., Díaz-Cayeros, A. & Ruiz Euler, A. (2019). Public Good Provision and Conventional Governance in Indigenous Communities in Oaxaca, Mexico. Comparative Political Research, 52(12), 1841-1880.
Matías, P. (2019). Inauguran en Oaxaca parque eólico de Mitsubishi; protestan frente a Rocío Nahle. Proceso. Might 28.
Mejía, C. E. (2017). Sociedad Civil Y Violencia: El Conflicto Por El Parque Eólico En Territorio Ikojt De San Dionisio Del Mar. Acta Sociológica 74. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 81–106
Mejía-Montero, A., Alonso-Serna, L., Altamirano-Allende, C. (2020). The function of social resistance in shaping vitality transition coverage in Mexico: the case of wind energy in Oaxaca. In Guimarães, L. N. (Ed.) The Regulation and Coverage of Latin American Power Transitions. Sao Paulo, Brazil: ScienceDirect eBooks, pp. 303-318.
Nardi, A., & Ramirez, J. (2017). Eco-friendly enterprise or environmental injustices? Worldwide vitality investments and indigenous struggles in Oaxaca, Mexico. Paper offered at Congress of the Nordic Latin American Analysis Community (NOLAN), Gothemburg, Sweden
OHCHR. (2013). Comunidad San Dionsio Del Mar. AI Indigenous (2001-8) MEX 36/2012. The Workplace of the Excessive Commissioner for Human Rights. Mexico Metropolis. Obtainable at https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadFile?gId=31813
Pansera, M. (2012). Renewable Power for Rural Areas of Bolivia, Renewable and Sustainable Power Evaluations, 16, 6694-6704.
Ramirez, J. (2019). Contentious Dynamics Inside the Social Turbulence of Environmental (In)justice Surrounding Wind Power Farms in Oaxaca, Mexico, Journal of Enterprise Ethics.
Robbins, P. (2011). Political ecology: A crucial introduction. Vol. 16. John Wiley & Sons.
Rueda, E. C. (2011). Eolicos e Inversion Privada: El Caso de San Mateo Del Mar, En El Istmo de Tehuantepec Oaxaca. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 16 (2), 257–277
Secretaría de Gobernación (SEGOB). (2015). La Energía Eólica en Mexico – Una perspectiva social sobre el valor de la tierra. Comisión Para el Dialogo con los Pueblos Indigenas de Mexico. Obtainable at: https://www.gob.mx/segob/documentos/la-energia-eolica-en-mexico-una-perspectiva-social-sobre-el-valor-de-la-tierra
Sellwood, S. A., & Gabriela, V. (2018). Interrupting Inexperienced Capital on the Frontiers of Wind Energy in Southern Mexico. Latin American Views, 45(5), 204–21.
Setyowati, A. B. (2021). Mitigating inequality with emissions? Exploring vitality justice and financing transitions to low carbon vitality in Indonesia, Power Analysis & Social Science, 71, 1-10.
Tapia, F. C., Galvez, Okay. L., Ben, A. C. Y., Robinson, S. S., Saynes, A., Quintana, R. D., & Garcia, M. T. (2015) Análisis de la Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental y del Resolutivo del Proyecto “Eólica del Sur” MIA-20OA2013E0071, Unión de Científicos Comprometidos con la Sociedad (UCCS).
Tsosie, R. (2019). Indigenous Sustainability and Resilience to Local weather Extremes: Conventional Information and the Techniques of Survival, Connecticut Regulation Overview 51(4), 1009-1042.
UN. (2012). Sustainable Power For All: A International Motion Agenda, The Secretary-Normal’s Excessive-Stage Group on Sustainable Power for All, Obtainable at https://www.seforall.org/system/files/gather-content/SEFA-Action-Agenda-Final.pdf
Vangardia (2018). SCJN falla a favor de los indígenas de Juchitán y en contra de parque eólico español. Vanguardia. 11 January.
Villagómez, Y., Gómez, H. S., & Zafra. G. (1998). Campesinos, the State, and Agrarian Group within the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. In Snyder, R., & Torres, G. (Eds.), The Future Position of the Ejido in Rural Mexico, 101–12. College of California.
Villavicencio, C. P. & Mauger, R. (2017). The UN’s new sustainable improvement agenda and renewable vitality: the problem to achieve SDG7 whereas reaching vitality justice. Journal of Power & Pure Sources Regulation, 36(2), 233-254.
Walker, G. (2009). Past Distribution and Proximity: Exploring the A number of Spatialities of Environmental Justice. Antipode, 41(4), 614-636.
Wohling, M. (2009). The Downside of Scale in Indigenous Information: a Perspective from Northern Australia, Ecology and Society, 14(1).
Zavala, J. C. (2020). En Oaxaca se produce el 62% de la energía eólica generada en el país. El Common, Oaxaca, January 6.
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations