On Friday’s PBS NewsHour, anchor Judy Woodruff completed the week-in-review section by asking Washington Submit columnist Jonathan Capehart and New York Instances columnist David Brooks concerning the Democrats making a choose committee on the January 6 Capitol riot. Capehart took out a bucket of rhetorical sugar, insisting Speaker Nancy Pelosi is not only a “religious Catholic,” however a loyal constitutionalist.
CAPEHART: Effectively, I do suppose we’ll be taught quite a bit. However the important thing factor that everybody one ought to remember is that, for Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who’s a deeply devoted individual, religious Catholic, her love of the Structure ranks up there as quantity two when it comes to her — what she strongly believes in.
And for her, as a member of Congress representing a district in California, as a constitutional officer, as speaker of the Home, for her, her allegiance an oath to the Structure is inviolable. And the truth that individuals stormed the Capitol on a very sacred, sacred day and sacred course of for American democracy, certifying the election, it was an affront to her as an American and an affront to her because the speaker of the Home.
It was an vital course of, however now it is partisan. The party-line vote proves it. Capehart insisted “anybody who thinks that that is solely a partisan train would not actually perceive who she is and why she is doing it.” The liberals are at all times idealists first and partisans someplace down the listing!
David Brooks provided his tribute to “actually robust” Liz Cheney, giving her the you-go-girl therapy:
BROOKS: Liz Cheney has a very robust individual. To go in opposition to her personal chief and to just accept this appointment from Nancy Pelosi, that reveals she’s simply very robust. And he or she has determined that her — it is her oath to defend the Structure, to look into that what occurred on January 6. And extra energy to her.
As to what the Republican chief, Kevin McCarthy, does, I am intrigued. Does he go — I assume he’ll workers his facet of the committee, as a result of, in any other case, the Republicans can be silenced. Does he go and get tremendous hard-charging, fire-breathing right-wingers who will make Fox pleased and form of disrupt the entire works — what Elise Stefanik has grow to be — or does he go together with individuals who truly voted to certify the Biden election? I think about he’ll go together with the hard-chargers, and we’ll get one thing of a political theater.
Even so, Brooks mentioned “I do suppose we’ll be taught stuff, simply from witnesses, simply from the back-and-forth of politics.” A part of that political back-and-forth is the liberal media gorging on the story. If there’s partisan benefit to be gained, the liberal media can be eagerly searching for it.